Showing posts with label Sam Mendes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sam Mendes. Show all posts

Saturday, 17 November 2012

Skyfall (2012, Sam Mendes)


With the help from a tight collaborative unit led by director Sam Mendes, the James Bond franchise takes a celebratory look back over its 50 years while offering a much needed solid instalment, putting it back on track. There is plenty to praise here and Skyfall is largely a return to form while covering new ground; but as the filmmakers, and Bond himself, re-evaluate his place in the modern world it makes  for a fun self referential ride without promising much of a future for this still wavering hero.

Starting in Istanbul we're dropped in the middle of a mission tinkering on the edge of failure, as Bond embarks on a chase to retain some stolen data from the hands of an unknown. The sequence is stunning in execution with events unfurling and becoming increasingly perilous with each turn. If the dazzling opening to Casino Royale was the benchmark to beat, the yardstick as now been moved with Bond utilising cars, bikes, trains, and diggers.

Skyfall has running through it, an overt sense of not only resurrection but also reinvention, with the opening events culminating to a fitting finale of which the Adele aided title sequence takes us through. The story here is much to do with M (Judi Dench) facing her past and to be trialled, unsanctioned, by a unfortunate past event echoed in the suspenseful pre-credits conclusion. With M's life in danger and the identity of undercover agents at risk Bond returns to duty as scarred and unfit as ever before to put things right. Despite some tremendous set pieces and examples of action, the film offers a new dynamic on the oedipal relationship of M to Bond and unearths details of his past, setting him as opposite side of the same coin to Javier Bardem's chillingly portrayed Mr. Silva.

Bardem makes for a classic Bond villain and really the only memorable one so far in the series donning Daniel Craig. His hair, like his Oscar winning villain of Anton Chigurh, is unnatural and at odds with his setting. His lines delivered with a camp menace, effeminate but never leaving you to question his power for punishment. Silva is also given a stunning entrance, executed in a controlled manner seldom seen in modern films of this level; as Silva is seen from a distance coming down a lift, he delivers a speech to a helpless Bond in a long-take as the camera slowly zooms from over Bond's shoulder into a tight close-up. It's this kind of lensing that truly sets Skyfall apart as Roger Deakins photography steals the show. In a battle against a sniper Bond fights his opponent against the surrealist neon lights of Shanghai, a tense showdown of false reflections and shadows marking a major highlight of the film.

This extra level of artistry and drama elevates Skyfall from an average Bond movie, with a Brit director of theatre bringing his world famous cinematographer and composer on board with him it's impossible to imagine it going any other way. Though as the film certainly covers new ground and presents us with a fully realised world compared to the familiar or fragmented nature of past efforts there are undeniable problems that lead this newest instalment to be somewhat disappointing, if only for the tantalising possibilities it lays down from the start. Skyfall has not one but two 'Bond Girls'; Eve (Naomi Harris) is a field agent seen in the opening Istanbul sequence promising a new perspective on a woman's place in the Bond world. After such feisty promise of a character with much to give she is sidelined into flat scenes in which she seduces Bond and in the end chooses a desk job over the field. Even more frustrating is the treatment of Bérénice Marlohe's femme fatale, who after being introduced as an untrustworthy tragic figure not so distant from Bond's own past, is disposed of without a second thought. Even the climactic showdown between Silva feels thwarted compared with what came before it. There is much to marvel in Skyfall but enough examples of deflation to go alongside them.

As Bond steps into an Aston Martin DB5 he doesn't just figuratively step into his past but literally drives back to his childhood home where an unspoken trauma is made known, an event in the past which led to the death of his parents and the meeting of M. The manor of which he grew up is grande in the Scottish valley with Deakins creating awe-inspiring visuals both beautiful and haunting. As the film shifts into this gear it feels less a Bond film and more a home invasion scenario, a still tense portion as Bond, his old grounds keeper (Albert Finney), and M defend against the overwhelming forces of Silva. Thomas Newman's terrific score also becomes more apparent as throughout his arrangements flit and mix between ultra modern and the classical, fitting with the position our hero and M find themselves in.

Skyfall certainly makes for a thrilling ride, one which hits levels of drama not seen before in the franchise as we're taken into the dark depths of some familiar characters' pasts. Yet despite all the film's insightful retrospection and trips into nostalgia (on its 50th anniversary it was bound to happen) it's the future that lays troublingly open. It makes known that Bond is at odds with the modern world, gadgets aren't of any use because anyone on the street has advanced technology now and allegorically the representation of women puts the Bond figure in a state far from the days of Dr. No misogyny. So as much as watching Daniel Craig as Bond in all his damaged marvel and traumatic ties is riveting due to the actor's unmistakable command of the character, Skyfall sees the franchise deal with its own past and come to terms with the world it finds itself but this cathartic episode doesn't leave much hope as to how much further it can travel.

Thursday, 3 May 2012

Away We Go (2009, Sam Mendes)



After visiting suburban angst twice now in his career; debut Oscar winning feature American Beauty (1999) and his last effort Revolutionary Road (2008) adapted from the Richard Yates novel of the same name. Both films were a statement on the American dream, the disillusionment felt when life doesn't plan out the way you wanted, or the way it was promised you. At the heart of both films were couples imploding and collapsing under the weight of adult life, rightly or wrongly turning against each other in the most horrendous of ways, punishing each other for negativity out of both their control. Refreshing then is the new film from Sam Mendes, which pits a rather endearing couple not against each other but against the world as they prepare to welcome a new life into it.


Away We Go can be described as both a road movie and romantic comedy, but whereas the film closely follows the formula of the former it's the approach towards the latter which sets this film high above the rest. The romantic comedy has been, since the beginning, a battle of sexes; we know they'll end up together in the end but the pleasure comes from the two destined-to-be character's obliviousness of their feelings being a product of love, not hate. Just think of the Howard Hawks' early comedies Bringing Up Baby (1939) and His Girl Friday (1940) for the most perfect examples. By modern standards the genre has devolved, displaying more sexist attitudes than ever typically present in the 1940s onwards, and with a new found cynicism and contempt for their rather unlikable and shallow characters. Surely in our age of equal rights these things should have been filtered out by now, not increased? Audiences don't seem to mind this problem and so neither does Hollywood.


Here we have an unmarried couple from the start, Burt (John Krasinski) and Verona (Maya Rudolph) live in a modest setting close to Burt's parents. Upon Verona's unexpected (but welcome) pregnancy and hearing of Burt's parents leaving to live in Belgium, the two set off on a trip to visit various family and friends to decide where their roots will be best settled to start a family. This is the disequilibrium present in Away We Go, there are no internal struggles between Burt and Verona, they love each other dearly and are only concerned about the upbringing of their baby.




In classic road movie style, each stop on the map introduces us to oddball larger than life characters that only seem to increase in vibrancy as the trip continues. Luckily there is a limit to the absurdity and doesn't overstay it's welcome. Each stop on the trip teaches Burt and Verona something about family and raising children, each is full of laughs and humour that never goes amiss; from Burt's parents (a brilliant Jeff Daniels and Catherine O'Hara) to Maggie Gyllenhaal as Burt's mad hippy cousin. Gyllenhaal is stellar and a sure standout, taking the humour from the harmless, to the unsettling, and all the way to the worrying. By the time our expecting couple have reached the near end of the trip they start to open up about their fears of parenthood, talking and reconciling each other over their insecurities. Seeing old college friends coping with yet another miscarriage and an unexpected trip to Burt's brother in miami remind them of the strains and trials life can could throw at them, however the two of them are ready to face it together with their undying love of each other. By this time we can only wish them the best.


Away We Go is a rare treat, a film with well drawn characters worth caring about, precision humour that never misses a beat, and an undercurrent of universial fear; the fear of parenthood that anyone can relate to whether they want kids or not. It's also an accurate portrayal of honest love (never sugar coated) and by the end we've been on an important journey with Burt and Verona, laughing and crying as they do. Away We Go has a sprinkle of Hollywood magic that's all to sparse these days and is a film worth embracing at all cost.

Revolutionary Road (2008, Sam Mendes)


Richard Yates' much lauded first novel Revolutionary Road was and still remains a powerful read; charting the failure of the American dream, post-war insecurities, and the inevitability of loneliness all around the relationship of one young suburban couple. Yates' first triumph still speaks volumes about the human need to conform despite the diminishing effects upon the soul, however this adaptation feels all too flat and lifeless. Despite the strong revered source material, Sam Mendes' film feels more like an echo of themes we've seen before and better, telling us nothing new and coming off as rather an unnecessary exercise.

The drama centres around Frank and April Wheeler as they settle into their new life in the suburbs. Upon their first meet at a party, April announces her dreams to become an actress whereas Frank admits he is still searching for his calling. They have two children, a beautiful house, both of which are looked after by April as Frank works. Frank is unhappy in his job at the same company his dad worked for, a company Frank swore he'd never work for as a child, though vowing never to follow his dad's footsteps he's done exactly that.  The Wheeler's see themselves as outsiders to their suburban neighbours, they feel superior over the others as they feel they don't belong in that lifeless environment. April decides the best way for them to leave their rut would be to move to Paris, for her to take on a secretarial position and support the family while Frank 'finds himself'. Frank needs convincing but is eventually seduced by the idea, but will the Wheelers escape their hollow lives on the idealistic Revolutionary Road and make it across the shores to gay Paris? With three cast members reunited for the first time since Titanic (1997) it doesn't seem likely.

Revolutionary Road sees Kate Winslet and Leonardo DiCaprio on top form and possibly never better as the Wheelers. Despite the supporting characters not being clearly defined enough to form a counter distinction between their views of contentiousness with suburbia along side the Wheeler's distain for it, there isn't a dud performance in sight. Michael Shannon as John Givings; the recently released mental patient son of Mrs. Givings (Kathy Bates) quite literally steals the show in the few scenes he has. On screen John works as a not so subtle mechanism in the story to speak the unspeakable and get things moving amongst Frank and April as they weaver between their new life and their current one. John could have been a jarring and awkward presence if cast wrong but Shannon elevates this minor (but important) character bringing life to every frame he dominates. He represents the voice of the repressed, he sees everything for what it is and isn't afraid to speak out even at the cost of offending. He is disgusted by his mother's dull way of living as well as the Wheelers' and becomes the voice of reason they lack the courage to hear. John Givings is the most memorable part of Revolutionary Road which only highlights the films lack elsewhere.

With a weak bunch of poorly realised supporting characters we're given little to no juxtaposition in a story that clearly needs it. The film's structure is also a problem as we get only the slightest glimpse of a life before suburban angst sets in on Frank and April, again if we were allowed access into the happier if not alternate lifestyle before their marriage and move we'd get some more of that much needed juxtaposition. Instead we're more or less thrown into the centre of an unhappy marriage filled with disillusionment form the outset, it's easy to identify with the despair but not easy to bond with the couple making the whole film a rather jaded and cynical affair.

It must be said that the film deals with the big picture of societal problems and so isn't fixated on well drawn character studies, though this isn't an excuse that will stick. With filmmaker's such as David Lynch (Blue Velvet), Todd Haynes (Far From Heaven) and even Mendes himself (American Beauty) covering this suburban nightmare before and with better results, Revolutionary Road needed something to set itself a part and to offer something more than this. It merely ends up as a footnote compared to previous examples.

As said before the performances are wholly impressive and often powerful, especially when Frank and April really go for each other's throats. Sam Mendes shows his flair for composition and for creating a fitting atmosphere, this time accompanied by master cinematographer Roger Deakins and composer Thomas Newman once again. Each shot is flawless, with each frame holding interest and textures to marvel at. Deakins could very well be the best working in his field today. Newman graces us with his usual minimalist nuanced piano which is affecting without drawing attention though it can also feel recycled at times.

All in all Revolutionary Road is a fine stand alone film despite some weak developments in vital areas. With filmmakers of this level bringing a book of Yates' stature to the screen, the results were never going to be completely without merit. It just appears that this particular adaptation came a little too late to flourish in all its worth.

For fans of: American Beauty (1999), Far From Heaven (2002), Little Children (2006)